Dear All

I have an interface class like Interface_1 with event and methods like
event1,event2 , M1() , M2

If I implemet this interface in other calss like myClass  ; I can implement
the mothods M1() , M2() only but cannot raise the events  event1,event2

Any advice ..

*****************************************************************
**************************check code below ************************
*****************************************************************
' ----------------------------
Interface_1.cls
'-----------------------------

Public Event event1()
Public Event event2()

Public Function M1()

End Function


Public Function M2()

End Function
'-----------------------------------------------
MyClass.cls
'-----------------------------------------------
Option Explicit

Implements Interface_1

Private Sub Class_Initialize()

End Sub

Private Sub Class_Terminate()

End Sub

Private Function Interface_1_M1() As Variant

End Function

Private Function Interface_1_M2() As Variant

End Function
'--------------------------------------------

Events aren't part of the interface, just add them to your classes

Also, please trim the crosspost if you reply.  Of the groups you included
only m.p.vb.general.discussion is appropriate for this question.

I noticed the other day that the events are parts of the interface in
vb.net/c#.

Michael

[irrelevant groups snipped]

AFAIK this is because events are implemented in a different way (via delegates) in these languages.  IMO events _should_
be part of interfaces but this was not the case in VB6 unfortunately.
FWIW,

    Mike


- Microsoft Visual Basic MVP -
E-Mail: ED***@mvps.org
WWW: Http://EDais.mvps.org/

Could be; neither of those languages is VB though.

Could be, it doesn't have most of the faults of VB.

Michael

Troll, troll, troll your boat....

Sorry, couldn't help myself. :-)

Michael

All languages have their faults and limitations.  It's a real shame because
the core VB language could have been extended and many of the "faults"
repaired without discarding the baby with the bath water.

Have you used .net much? Originally I would have agreed with you but after
using it a while I understand why they had to start over.

Michael

I have used it, although I abandoned VB.Net as a joke early on and what I
have done has been using C#.

I do not mean that they had to stay with the COM platform.  I mean that they
should have done everything possible to retain as much source-level
compatibility with the language as possible.  VB did *not* have to be
trashed in order to extend it.

Same here, although I didn't think vb.net was a joke, I just thought it
would be better to go with C#. I was suprised what a non event switching
was.

I partly agree but partly don't. I think some sort of radical change was
needed but they should have made a better upgrade path. In what you wrote i
would remove the words "everything possible" and replaced it with "a lot
more". I think if they did everything possible there would be too many
compromises.

Michael

Just another "noble defender" eh?

The Slow Brain Death of VB.NET
"VB.NET is so awesome of an upgrade, in fact, that these noble defenders of
the faith chose not to use it."
http://www.codinghorror.com/bl­og/archives/000235.html

HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found.

Michael

If you copy the link text into your address bar, it works fine.  It was a
typo in the actual link.  Instead of sending you to
www.codinghorror.com/blog/... , it instead pointed you to
www.codinghorror.com/bl-og/... I've notified Mr. Halter about his error and
hopefully he will fix it in future posts.

Chris Lieb

Show quoteHide quote

Multiple Timer Advice
form section color
Height limitation of picturebox
checkbox always is disabled!!!!
Simulating relational database with text files
Binary Math Help
Delimma
Automated EMail Not working...
Something better than DoEvents?
Finding out font's file name