|
code
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message The point being....what? Spam?news:49b4ee5a$0$16214$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se... | http://www.z-a-recovery.com/download.htm | | /Henning "C Kevin Provance" <BillMRapedMySh***@.netblows.ms> skrev i meddelandet Everyone is free to label it, sorry forgot the OT.news:eKwIONLoJHA.4372@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > "Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message > news:49b4ee5a$0$16214$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se... > | http://www.z-a-recovery.com/download.htm > | > | /Henning > > The point being....what? Spam? > > /Henning > Personally I'd prefer an explanation to an "OT".> Everyone is free to label it, sorry forgot the OT. > I never follow "solitary" links, and I don't understand why people do it. I figure that if someone can't bother to write a sentence or two explaining what they're talking about (or rather what they're not talking about) then it can't be very important. "mayayana" <mayayaX***@rcXXn.com> wrote in message I agree with you there. If the person is too lazy to provide a little bit of news:%23jhqaEMoJHA.3984@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Personally I'd prefer an explanation to an "OT". > I never follow "solitary" links, and I don't understand > why people do it. I figure that if someone can't bother > to write a sentence or two explaining what they're > talking about (or rather what they're not talking about) > then it can't be very important. > > information about a link it probably isn't worth looking at.
Show quote
Hide quote
"Nobody" <trin***@nobody.com> wrote in message I think you have one word too many in your comment. I prefer -news:%23KkaRFNoJHA.3312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > "mayayana" <mayayaX***@rcXXn.com> wrote in message > news:%23jhqaEMoJHA.3984@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > Personally I'd prefer an explanation to an "OT". > > I never follow "solitary" links, and I don't understand > > why people do it. I figure that if someone can't bother > > to write a sentence or two explaining what they're > > talking about (or rather what they're not talking about) > > then it can't be very important. > > > > > > I agree with you there. If the person is too lazy to provide a little bit of > information about a link it probably isn't worth looking at. > > Show quoteHide quote > I agree with you there. If the person is too lazy to provide a little bit of > information about a link it isn't worth looking at.
Show quote
Hide quote
"mayayana" <mayayaX***@rcXXn.com> skrev i meddelandet FWIW, damage already done, here comes a sentence or two.news:%23jhqaEMoJHA.3984@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > >> Everyone is free to label it, sorry forgot the OT. >> > > Personally I'd prefer an explanation to an "OT". > I never follow "solitary" links, and I don't understand > why people do it. I figure that if someone can't bother > to write a sentence or two explaining what they're > talking about (or rather what they're not talking about) > then it can't be very important. > > This is a tool to recover data from a corrupt hard-drive. It is shareware, so the 'free' version is limited in how many dirctories/files you can recover at a time. To recover more files, you have to start all over from the beginning. On the page there is also a tool to recover mails from a corrupt .pst file. Already sorry for posting /Henning 
Other interesting topics
With .... End With - Speed
Public Thank You To Microsoft Wrap a Long String Number Puzzle Subclassing a la Caton vb6 closes with erro after I installed msdn oct 2001 Control Container Property - Why Use It? Does anybody know how to translate this C# code to VB6? Need a Friend, Maybe Which is the Best Twain ActiveX? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
