"Dave" <KingOfTheBeach@community.nospam> wrote in
news:ueCvFBRXHHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

> I have a VB program that on some PC's it generates an error 126 when
> the program attempts to bind to a socket.   What makes this difficult
> is there is no documentation on error 126 and the description is
> empty.  Does anyone know anything about this error?  Any suggestions?
>
>   With objWinsock
>     .Protocol = sckUDPProtocol
>     Err.Clear
>     ' listen on 5X006
>     .Bind "59006"
>     If Err.Number <> 0 Then
>       ReportError Err.Description, Err.Number, _
>         "Bind " & strRegCacheNspPortNum
>       Err.Clear
>       Unload Me
>       Exit Sub
>     End If
>   End With
>
> Any help would be appreciated, thanks
> Dave
>
>
>

"DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a.n.e.t> wrote in message
news:Xns98E8616EF3DDFthisnthatadelphianet@194.177.96.78...
> "Dave" <KingOfTheBeach@community.nospam> wrote in
> news:ueCvFBRXHHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>
>> I have a VB program that on some PC's it generates an error 126 when
>> the program attempts to bind to a socket.   What makes this difficult
>> is there is no documentation on error 126 and the description is
>> empty.  Does anyone know anything about this error?  Any suggestions?
>>
>>   With objWinsock
>>     .Protocol = sckUDPProtocol
>>     Err.Clear
>>     ' listen on 5X006
>>     .Bind "59006"
>>     If Err.Number <> 0 Then
>>       ReportError Err.Description, Err.Number, _
>>         "Bind " & strRegCacheNspPortNum
>>       Err.Clear
>>       Unload Me
>>       Exit Sub
>>     End If
>>   End With
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated, thanks
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>
> Your .Bind call is incorrect.
>
> In the VB6 IDE, press F2 to bring up the object browser. Select
> MSWinsockLib in the top drop-down. Then in the left pane click on
> Winsock, on the right, all of the properties, subs, and events will be
> shown.
>
> Try it this way:
>
>>   With objWinsock
>>     .Protocol = sckUDPProtocol
>>     .LocalPort = 59006
>>     .Bind
>
>
> Regards,
>
> DanS
>
>

"Walter Wang [MSFT]" <waw***@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:MCDfojvXHHA.372@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl...
> Hi Dave,
>
> Your code runs fine on my side. Error 126 means "The specified module
> could
> not be found"
> (http://www.planetsourcecode.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=48434&lng
> WId=1). The winsock control depends on WSock32.dll. Try to use Dependency
> Walker (www.dependencywalker.com/) to load %windir%\system32\mswinsck.ocx
> and see if any dependent files are missing.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Walter Wang (waw***@online.microsoft.com, remove 'online.')
> Microsoft Online Community Support
>
> ==================================================
> Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
> ications. If you are using Outlook Express, please make sure you clear the
> check box "Tools/Options/Read: Get 300 headers at a time" to see your
> reply
> promptly.
>
> Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
> where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
> Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
> up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
> professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
> most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
> that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
> project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
> handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
> Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
> ==================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>

"Walter Wang [MSFT]" <waw***@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:MCDfojvXHHA.372@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl...
> Hi Dave,
>
> Your code runs fine on my side. Error 126 means "The specified module
> could
> not be found"
> (http://www.planetsourcecode.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=48434&lng
> WId=1). The winsock control depends on WSock32.dll. Try to use Dependency
> Walker (www.dependencywalker.com/) to load %windir%\system32\mswinsck.ocx
> and see if any dependent files are missing.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Walter Wang (waw***@online.microsoft.com, remove 'online.')
> Microsoft Online Community Support
>
> ==================================================
> Get notification to my posts through email? Please refer to
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/managednewsgroups/default.aspx#notif
> ications. If you are using Outlook Express, please make sure you clear the
> check box "Tools/Options/Read: Get 300 headers at a time" to see your
> reply
> promptly.
>
> Note: The MSDN Managed Newsgroup support offering is for non-urgent issues
> where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support
> Engineer within 1 business day is acceptable. Please note that each follow
> up response may take approximately 2 business days as the support
> professional working with you may need further investigation to reach the
> most efficient resolution. The offering is not appropriate for situations
> that require urgent, real-time or phone-based interactions or complex
> project analysis and dump analysis issues. Issues of this nature are best
> handled working with a dedicated Microsoft Support Engineer by contacting
> Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS) at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/support/default.aspx.
> ==================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>

> 1&x=0&y=0
>
>
> Regards,
> Walter Wang (waw***@online.microsoft.com, remove 'online.')
> Microsoft Online Community Support
>
> ==================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> ==================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
news:uRy1aD6XHHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> "Dave" posted...
> : ... mswinsck.ocx.
>
> Also, close down the VB5/6 IDE. Open a command prompt and
> type:
>
> CD %systemroot%\system32
> DIR mswinsck.*
>
> You should see an .oca file. Delete the mswinsck.oca file and then
> restart the IDE. The IDE will recreate that file when it starts.
>
> Also, .Bind is supposed to be for TCP rather than UDP according
> to the help documentation. You can set the port number properly
> in the control properties. Perhaps the only other time .Bind needs to
> get called is during dynamic creation(?) of such a control.
>
> Has anyone here successfully dynamically created a winsock
> object?
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> Post replies to the group.
>
>

> tml/vbmthBindMethod.asp).
>
> You might want to take a look at http://www.vbip.com for alternate
approach
> to use winsock in VB6.
>
> Regards,
> Walter Wang (waw***@online.microsoft.com, remove 'online.')
> Microsoft Online Community Support
>
> ==================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> ==================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
>

> tml/vbmthBindMethod.asp).
>
> You might want to take a look at http://www.vbip.com for alternate
approach
> to use winsock in VB6.
>
> Regards,
> Walter Wang (waw***@online.microsoft.com, remove 'online.')
> Microsoft Online Community Support
>
> ==================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> ==================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
>

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
news:eWfChyDYHHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Jim Carlock" stated...
> > Has anyone here successfully dynamically created a winsock
> > object?
>
> "Dave" replied...
> : You actually need to put the winsock OCX on a form to use it,
> : it won't operate any other way.
> :
> : Hmmm, thats a good point, why is there a bind in there at all, I
> : will look into that.
>
> Perhaps one reason to use it, but I've never looked into it...
>
> It accepts both an IP address and a port. So perhaps it can be
> used to bind to a specific network adapter (if two or more exist
> on the system).
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> Post replies to the group.
>
>

"Dave" <KingOfTheBeach@community.nospam> skrev i meddelandet
news:%23bW3lIMYHHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> It doesn't seem to want to receive data until the bind is called.  I
wonder
> why the documentation says its for TCP only if you can't get UDP data to
> receive until you call bind.
>
> "Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
> news:eWfChyDYHHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> > "Jim Carlock" stated...
> > > Has anyone here successfully dynamically created a winsock
> > > object?
> >
> > "Dave" replied...
> > : You actually need to put the winsock OCX on a form to use it,
> > : it won't operate any other way.
> > :
> > : Hmmm, thats a good point, why is there a bind in there at all, I
> > : will look into that.
> >
> > Perhaps one reason to use it, but I've never looked into it...
> >
> > It accepts both an IP address and a port. So perhaps it can be
> > used to bind to a specific network adapter (if two or more exist
> > on the system).
> >
> > --
> > Jim Carlock
> > Post replies to the group.
> >
> >
>
>

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> skrev i meddelandet
news:%23jZy3DTYHHA.1008@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> "Henning" posted...
> : For UDP, you _have_ to bind it to a port. The nature of UDP is to
> : send data to a listener ip:port.
>
> TCP works that way too. The difference between the two involves
> TCP establishes a "connection" while UDP is connectionless. TCP
> creates a connection through a three-way handshake and employs
> flow-control and error correction, while UDP represents a light-
> weight implementation where the application programmer needs
> to implement such error corrections and such.
>
> I tested .Bind on the Winsock control and it seems to force the
> control to use the TCP protocol. I'd like some other verification
> if possible.
>
> Setting the .Protocol property after binding causes an error.
>
> Setting the .Protocol property before works but the control turns
> to itself into the TCP state when .Bind gets called (as seen inside
> of SysInternals TCPView application).
>
> I'm using TCPView from SysInternals and it shows alot of open
> UDP ports but I'm striking out on getting the WinSock control to
> show up as UDP (dynamically trying to push the control over from
> TCP to UDP by setting the .Protocol property).
>
> I'm using SP6 Winsock control (dated 03/09/2004  03:45 PM).
> MD5: e8a2190a9e8ee5e5d2e0b599bbf9dda6 *mswinsck.ocx
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> Post replies to the group.
>
>
Thats odd!

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
news:eoI5fmYYHHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "Jim Carlock" posted...
> > Setting the .Protocol property before works but the control turns
> > to itself into the TCP state when .Bind gets called (as seen inside
> > of SysInternals TCPView application).
>
>
> "Henning" wrote..
> : Thats odd!
> : Setting it up as follows, and it uses UDP for tx and rx. sckUDPProtocol
is
> : choosen in the Object Properties on the form.
>
> Yes. My mistake. I left a TCP port control open (as TCP) and only
> changed one of the controls to UDP. The UDP control sent it's stuff
> through though, and the TCP control received it (without a connection
> so that was definitely odd). Bad code caused the problem. Thanks
> Henning, you're absolutely correct!
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> Post replies to the group.
>
>

"Dave" <KingOfTheBeach@community.nospam> skrev i meddelandet
news:%23u$69alYHHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> As I stated in another section of this thread the code actually works
> properly until its run on a machine running bitDefender.  It is strange
how
> the program fails though I would expect the program to be able to bind to
a
> socket regardless of what security software is running.  It would just not
> be able to receive any data.  In this cause BitDefender actually causes
the
> winsock control to through errors.  I'm actually considered engineering
the
> darn thing out.  Historically its been more trouble than anything else
> anyway.
>
>
> "Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
> news:eoI5fmYYHHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> > "Jim Carlock" posted...
> > > Setting the .Protocol property before works but the control turns
> > > to itself into the TCP state when .Bind gets called (as seen inside
> > > of SysInternals TCPView application).
> >
> >
> > "Henning" wrote..
> > : Thats odd!
> > : Setting it up as follows, and it uses UDP for tx and rx.
sckUDPProtocol
> is
> > : choosen in the Object Properties on the form.
> >
> > Yes. My mistake. I left a TCP port control open (as TCP) and only
> > changed one of the controls to UDP. The UDP control sent it's stuff
> > through though, and the TCP control received it (without a connection
> > so that was definitely odd). Bad code caused the problem. Thanks
> > Henning, you're absolutely correct!
> >
> > --
> > Jim Carlock
> > Post replies to the group.
> >
> >
>
>

"Dave" <KingOfTheBeach@community.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23u$69alYHHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> As I stated in another section of this thread the code actually works
> properly until its run on a machine running bitDefender.  It is strange
how
> the program fails though I would expect the program to be able to bind to
a
> socket regardless of what security software is running.  It would just not
> be able to receive any data.  In this cause BitDefender actually causes
the
> winsock control to through errors.  I'm actually considered engineering
the
> darn thing out.  Historically its been more trouble than anything else
> anyway.
>
>
> "Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
> news:eoI5fmYYHHA.5044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> > "Jim Carlock" posted...
> > > Setting the .Protocol property before works but the control turns
> > > to itself into the TCP state when .Bind gets called (as seen inside
> > > of SysInternals TCPView application).
> >
> >
> > "Henning" wrote..
> > : Thats odd!
> > : Setting it up as follows, and it uses UDP for tx and rx.
sckUDPProtocol
> is
> > : choosen in the Object Properties on the form.
> >
> > Yes. My mistake. I left a TCP port control open (as TCP) and only
> > changed one of the controls to UDP. The UDP control sent it's stuff
> > through though, and the TCP control received it (without a connection
> > so that was definitely odd). Bad code caused the problem. Thanks
> > Henning, you're absolutely correct!
> >
> > --
> > Jim Carlock
> > Post replies to the group.
> >
> >
>
>

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
news:Oox$RVqYHHA.4264@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> "Dave" wrote...
> : Thanks for all  your suggestions. We just downloaded an
> : eval of BitDefender, we will work our way through it.
> What OS are you using? Perhaps there's a better firewall
> available for that OS.
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> Post replies to the group.
>
>

>"Jim Carlock" questioned...
>: What OS are you using? Perhaps there's a better firewall
>: available for that OS.
>
>
>"Dave" replied...
>: The user was running Windows XP
>
>Kerio Personal Version 2.15 is pretty good for XP. It's hard
>to find, though. And then it requires an additional filter to filter
>broken packets. I'm waiting on some email replies to come
>back. The filter that I use has also been discontinued by the
>developer. I'll get back with you in a couple of days if you're
>interested in this.

"Stefan Berglund" <sorry.no.kool***@for.me> wrote in message
news:l72fv218m9nd9ciqv1nb7ipi3oedj1vtaq@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:32:15 -0400, "Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost>
> wrote:
>  in <OGG#DHfZHHA.4***@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>
>
> >"Jim Carlock" questioned...
> >: What OS are you using? Perhaps there's a better firewall
> >: available for that OS.
> >
> >
> >"Dave" replied...
> >: The user was running Windows XP
> >
> >Kerio Personal Version 2.15 is pretty good for XP. It's hard
> >to find, though. And then it requires an additional filter to filter
> >broken packets. I'm waiting on some email replies to come
> >back. The filter that I use has also been discontinued by the
> >developer. I'll get back with you in a couple of days if you're
> >interested in this.
>
> I swear by Kerio.  I run version 2.1.5 on every box on my network and it
> cohabitates quite nicely with both SQL Server and PostgreSQL.
>
> ---
> Stefan Berglund