Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About
Author
1 Mar 2007 3:48 PM
skennedyd
I have two words that I want to assing a data type (string) the two
words such as Pin Numbers, however, VB data type won't recognize
unless the two words are joined as one word.

And joining the two words is impossible since I am working with a pre
existing database.

Do you know how to work around this problem?

Author
1 Mar 2007 4:00 PM
Jeff Johnson
<skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172764091.038283.326840@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> I have two words that I want to assing a data type (string) the two
> words such as Pin Numbers, however, VB data type won't recognize
> unless the two words are joined as one word.
>
> And joining the two words is impossible since I am working with a pre
> existing database.
>
> Do you know how to work around this problem?

I have no idea what you're asking. Post some sample code that you tried
which didn't work and maybe we can glean something from it.

And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number. "PIN
Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just stupid.
Are all your drivers up to date? click for free checkup

Author
1 Mar 2007 4:21 PM
Bob Butler
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just
> stupid.

It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing wrong with
it.  I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
machine. <gd&r>

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:28 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever> wrote in message
news:O2ZKy2BXHHA.3652@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just
>> stupid.
>
> It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing wrong
> with
> it.  I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
> machine. <gd&r>

Run very fast.

I read a quote recently that I like: "Ignorance does not equal language
drift."
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:33 PM
Bob Butler
Show quote Hide quote
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
news:uZwPZ6BXHHA.1636@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
> "Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever> wrote in message
> news:O2ZKy2BXHHA.3652@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's
>>> just stupid.
>>
>> It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing
>> wrong with
>> it.  I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the
>> AT machine. <gd&r>
>
> Run very fast.
>
> I read a quote recently that I like: "Ignorance does not equal
> language drift."

nor does language drift equal ignorance

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:48 PM
Jan Hyde
"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever>'s wild thoughts were
released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:21:38 -0800 bearing the
following fruit:

>"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
>news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just
>> stupid.
>
>It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing wrong with
>it.

It doesn't make sense at all, but it's misuse has become so
common that it may seem so.

> I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
>machine. <gd&r>

Would you really say ATM machine? I'd say 'I'm off to use
the ATM'

'ATM machine' seems even odder then 'PIN number' to me.

Another misused phrase that gets to me is

'It would be cheap at half the price'

Well, yes it would, it would be half as much cheaper.
What you really mean is 'cheap at twice the price'

I swear the only thing that will keep me clinging to life as
I get old will be the desire to moan about things like this
;-)
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:54 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
news:sk0eu2lp1pk4p59qnir124hiuik1h2auil@4ax.com...

> Another misused phrase that gets to me is
>
> 'It would be cheap at half the price'

"Hot water heater"

"I could care less"

"I.e." used as "for example."

Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:05 PM
Jan Hyde
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam>'s wild thoughts were
released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:54:51 -0500 bearing the
following fruit:

>"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
>news:sk0eu2lp1pk4p59qnir124hiuik1h2auil@4ax.com...
>
>> Another misused phrase that gets to me is
>>
>> 'It would be cheap at half the price'
>
>"Hot water heater"



>"I could care less"

Used in the right context that could be funny.

J

Show quoteHide quote
>"I.e." used as "for example."
>
>Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:05 PM
Bob Butler
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
news:OCFMTJCXHHA.1000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl
> "Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
> news:sk0eu2lp1pk4p59qnir124hiuik1h2auil@4ax.com...
>
>> Another misused phrase that gets to me is
>>
>> 'It would be cheap at half the price'
>
> "Hot water heater"

I'm thinking of getting a cold water cooler just to have the set

> "I could care less"

Me too <g>

> "I.e." used as "for example."

Now that's just wrong!

> Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

We're ready for you now Mr Brynner

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:03 PM
Bob Butler
Show quote Hide quote
"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
news:sk0eu2lp1pk4p59qnir124hiuik1h2auil@4ax.com
> "Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever>'s wild thoughts were
> released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:21:38 -0800 bearing the
> following fruit:
>
>> "Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
>> news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's
>>> just stupid.
>>
>> It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing
>> wrong with it.
>
> It doesn't make sense at all, but it's misuse has become so
> common that it may seem so.

It makes sense to just about everybody else <g>

>> I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
>> machine. <gd&r>
>
> Would you really say ATM machine? I'd say 'I'm off to use
> the ATM'

I'd say "there's an ATM machine in there I need to use" or maybe leave out
"machine"... it wouldn't be a concious choice in that I wouldn't waste time
thinking about it.

> 'ATM machine' seems even odder then 'PIN number' to me.
>
> Another misused phrase that gets to me is
>
> 'It would be cheap at half the price'
>
> Well, yes it would, it would be half as much cheaper.
> What you really mean is 'cheap at twice the price'

idioms are just that; "I could care less" is the prime example since taken
literally it has a different meaning.  Computer languages are no place for
things like this but human languages are different.  If the meaning comes
through then it's all good.

> I swear the only thing that will keep me clinging to life as
> I get old will be the desire to moan about things like this
> ;-)

that's great because my goal is to be able to gripe about the moaners! <g>

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:46 PM
Robert Morley
> idioms are just that; "I could care less" is the prime example since taken
> literally it has a different meaning.

Actually, there's a much older example than that (albeit a word, not an
idiom):  nice.  There are very few people these days who would be insulted
if you told them they were a nice person.  That wasn't always the case.  For
those who aren't up on the etymology and historical usages of the word, see
definitions 1 through 4 at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/nice.



Rob
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:23 PM
Karl E. Peterson
Robert Morley <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>> idioms are just that; "I could care less" is the prime example since taken
>> literally it has a different meaning.
>
> Actually, there's a much older example than that (albeit a word, not an
> idiom):  nice.  There are very few people these days who would be insulted
> if you told them they were a nice person.  That wasn't always the case.  For
> those who aren't up on the etymology and historical usages of the word, see
> definitions 1 through 4 at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/nice.

Hence, "nice guys finish last..."?  Yep, still fits.
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org
Author
2 Mar 2007 9:02 AM
Jan Hyde
"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever>'s wild thoughts were
released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:03:44 -0800 bearing the
following fruit:

Show quoteHide quote
>"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
>news:sk0eu2lp1pk4p59qnir124hiuik1h2auil@4ax.com
>> "Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever>'s wild thoughts were
>> released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:21:38 -0800 bearing the
>> following fruit:
>>
>>> "Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
>>> news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>>>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>>>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's
>>>> just stupid.
>>>
>>> It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing
>>> wrong with it.
>>
>> It doesn't make sense at all, but it's misuse has become so
>> common that it may seem so.
>
>It makes sense to just about everybody else <g>

I'm used to that ;-)

Show quoteHide quote
>
>>> I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
>>> machine. <gd&r>
>>
>> Would you really say ATM machine? I'd say 'I'm off to use
>> the ATM'
>
>I'd say "there's an ATM machine in there I need to use" or maybe leave out
>"machine"... it wouldn't be a concious choice in that I wouldn't waste time
>thinking about it.
>
>> 'ATM machine' seems even odder then 'PIN number' to me.
>>
>> Another misused phrase that gets to me is
>>
>> 'It would be cheap at half the price'
>>
>> Well, yes it would, it would be half as much cheaper.
>> What you really mean is 'cheap at twice the price'
>
>idioms are just that; "I could care less" is the prime example since taken
>literally it has a different meaning.  Computer languages are no place for
>things like this but human languages are different.  If the meaning comes
>through then it's all good.

In this part of the country it's common to say

'I can't meet with you while November'

What they mean is

'I can't meet with you until December'

It's recognised in the dictionary but I hate it.

>> I swear the only thing that will keep me clinging to life as
>> I get old will be the desire to moan about things like this
>> ;-)
>
>that's great because my goal is to be able to gripe about the moaners! <g>

perfect ;-)
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:28 PM
Stefan Berglund
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:48:31 +0000, Jan Hyde
<StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
in <sk0eu2lp1pk4p59qnir124hiuik1h2a***@4ax.com>

Show quoteHide quote
>"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever>'s wild thoughts were
>released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:21:38 -0800 bearing the
>following fruit:
>
>>"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
>>news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just
>>> stupid.
>>
>>It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing wrong with
>>it.
>
>It doesn't make sense at all, but it's misuse has become so
>common that it may seem so.
>
>> I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
>>machine. <gd&r>
>
>Would you really say ATM machine? I'd say 'I'm off to use
>the ATM'
>
>'ATM machine' seems even odder then 'PIN number' to me.
>
>Another misused phrase that gets to me is
>
>'It would be cheap at half the price'
>
>Well, yes it would, it would be half as much cheaper.
>What you really mean is 'cheap at twice the price'
>
>I swear the only thing that will keep me clinging to life as
>I get old will be the desire to moan about things like this
>;-)
>

Or maybe - just maybe - the desire to moan just a wee little bit about
microsoft's misdeeds?  C'mon man - give me a break.  :-)
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:36 PM
Robert Morley
And of course, the problem with PI Number is that everybody would think you
meant 3.14 (~ish <g>).  So in that context, PIN Number does sorta make
sense, even if it's a little redundant.  But then again, humanity is rife
with redundancies.  Take, for example, international currency.  One common
format is:  CAD$100.00 or USD$100.00.  Now, why on earth do you need the
"D", which stands for dollars, when you've got the dollar-sign right next to
it?  What about an LCD display?  You actually DO need the display in there,
after a fashion, to distinguish it from an LCD TV, though I've always
preferred LCD monitor to refer to a computer screen.

What is it about us English people that we always want to shorten things,
anyway?  The Internet has, of course, brought up all kinds of abbreviations,
but what about even common things like Worcestershire sauce?  I don't know
very many people who actually pronounce all the syllables in that.  But I
digress....  I'll let you get back to the main point of "PIN Numbers". :)


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever> wrote in message
news:O2ZKy2BXHHA.3652@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
> news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>> "PIN Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just
>> stupid.
>
> It's common practice and makes perfect sense and there's nothing wrong
> with
> it.  I'd rather see a PIN number than a PI number or have to use the AT
> machine. <gd&r>
>
> --
> Reply to the group so all can participate
> VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:49 PM
Bob Butler
"Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
news:u4uZpgCXHHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl
> What is it about us English people that we always want to shorten
> things, anyway?

The one that sounds totally stupid to me is "cell phone".  That's something
you might find in prison.  Take the time to say "cellular" or use an
alternative like "mobile".  Your time is NOT that valuable that you have to
save those 2 syllables.

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:16 PM
Robert Morley
I don't think they allow in-cell phones in most prisons, so it's probably
fairly safe to allow "cell phone", even if it is an abbreviation.  I admit
to being guilty as charged on that one, though.


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever> wrote in message
news:uhfI1nCXHHA.4860@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
> news:u4uZpgCXHHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl
>> What is it about us English people that we always want to shorten
>> things, anyway?
>
> The one that sounds totally stupid to me is "cell phone".  That's
> something
> you might find in prison.  Take the time to say "cellular" or use an
> alternative like "mobile".  Your time is NOT that valuable that you have
> to
> save those 2 syllables.
>
> --
> Reply to the group so all can participate
> VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:19 PM
Rick Rothstein (MVP - VB)
> but what about even common things like Worcestershire sauce?
> I don't know very many people who actually pronounce all the
> syllables in that.

The pronunciation I think you are thinking about appears to be a "real" word
on its own...

http://www.answers.com/topic/worcester-sauce

Rick
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:26 PM
Robert Morley
That's ONE of the pronunciations I've heard.  I've also heard (using
pseudo-phonetic spelling, here) Worster sauce and Worstasher sauce, not to
mention various fumblings of the name that often end with a pointed finger
and "that stuff", and of course the vaguely amusing "what's this here
sauce".


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"Rick Rothstein (MVP - VB)" <rickNOSPAMnews@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in
message news:eFdld4CXHHA.896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> but what about even common things like Worcestershire sauce?
>> I don't know very many people who actually pronounce all the
>> syllables in that.
>
> The pronunciation I think you are thinking about appears to be a "real"
> word on its own...
>
> http://www.answers.com/topic/worcester-sauce
>
> Rick
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:42 PM
J French
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:26:01 -0500, "Robert Morley"
<rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:

>That's ONE of the pronunciations I've heard.  I've also heard (using
>pseudo-phonetic spelling, here) Worster sauce and Worstasher sauce, not to
>mention various fumblings of the name that often end with a pointed finger
>and "that stuff", and of course the vaguely amusing "what's this here
>sauce".

It is Wooster sauce but the 'oo' is shorter than the 'oo' in Booster

- closer to the way one pronounces 'u' in Push
Author
1 Mar 2007 7:22 PM
Robert Morley
So "Wooster" like you'd say, "don't be a wuss"? :)

Well, it may be that in the UK, but then again, you guys are known for
removing letters or entire syllables from the names of your towns, like
Norwich (pr. Norrich), Birmingham (Birminham), Gloucestershire
(Glostershire), Worcestershire (see previous discussion), and no doubt many
others that us poor North Americans are unaware of. <grin>


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"J French" <erew***@nowhere.uk> wrote in message
news:45e71d22.40509889@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:26:01 -0500, "Robert Morley"
> <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
>>That's ONE of the pronunciations I've heard.  I've also heard (using
>>pseudo-phonetic spelling, here) Worster sauce and Worstasher sauce, not to
>>mention various fumblings of the name that often end with a pointed finger
>>and "that stuff", and of course the vaguely amusing "what's this here
>>sauce".
>
> It is Wooster sauce but the 'oo' is shorter than the 'oo' in Booster
>
> - closer to the way one pronounces 'u' in Push
Author
1 Mar 2007 7:28 PM
Bob Butler
"Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
news:eyH9LcDXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl
> So "Wooster" like you'd say, "don't be a wuss"? :)
>
> Well, it may be that in the UK, but then again, you guys are known for
> removing letters or entire syllables from the names of your towns,
> like Norwich (pr. Norrich), Birmingham (Birminham), Gloucestershire
> (Glostershire), Worcestershire (see previous discussion), and no
> doubt many others that us poor North Americans are unaware of. <grin>

Live in New England for a while... Worcester, MA is also 'wooster' (and it's
close to 'wuss' but more emphasis on the vowel rather than the 's')


--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 8:00 PM
Rick Rothstein (MVP - VB)
>> So "Wooster" like you'd say, "don't be a wuss"? :)
>>
>> Well, it may be that in the UK, but then again, you guys are known for
>> removing letters or entire syllables from the names of your towns,
>> like Norwich (pr. Norrich), Birmingham (Birminham), Gloucestershire
>> (Glostershire), Worcestershire (see previous discussion), and no
>> doubt many others that us poor North Americans are unaware of. <grin>
>
> Live in New England for a while... Worcester, MA is also 'wooster' (and
> it's
> close to 'wuss' but more emphasis on the vowel rather than the 's')

First time we went to visit my wife's sister just after she moved to
Worcester... we completely missed the exit from the interstate highway to
the town (must have driven 20 miles past the exit before we became
suspicious)... she neglected to tell us that her town was pronounced
"Wooster" but was spelled "Worcester"... we **knew** she didn't live in a
town pronounced "war-kess-ter".<g>

Rick
Author
2 Mar 2007 1:50 AM
Stefan Berglund
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:28:11 -0800, "Bob Butler" <tiredofit@nospam.ever>
wrote:
in <#G8QFfDXHHA.4***@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>

>Live in New England for a while... Worcester, MA is also 'wooster' (and it's
>close to 'wuss' but more emphasis on the vowel rather than the 's')

I thought you were down the road a piece in south county.
Author
2 Mar 2007 1:36 PM
Bob Butler
"Stefan Berglund" <sorry.no.kool***@for.me> wrote in message
news:cl0fu2tcbf05ckq9ntndokiei5iijur08r@4ax.com
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:28:11 -0800, "Bob Butler"
> <tiredofit@nospam.ever> wrote:
>  in <#G8QFfDXHHA.4***@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
>
>> Live in New England for a while... Worcester, MA is also 'wooster'
>> (and it's close to 'wuss' but more emphasis on the vowel rather than
>> the 's')
>
> I thought you were down the road a piece in south county.

I am, but this isn't the only place I've lived

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
2 Mar 2007 12:25 AM
PeterD
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:22:37 -0500, "Robert Morley"
<rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:

>So "Wooster" like you'd say, "don't be a wuss"? :)
>
>Well, it may be that in the UK, but then again, you guys are known for
>removing letters or entire syllables from the names of your towns, like
>Norwich (pr. Norrich), Birmingham (Birminham), Gloucestershire
>(Glostershire), Worcestershire (see previous discussion), and no doubt many
>others that us poor North Americans are unaware of. <grin>
>
>

Worcester MA. Big city...

pronounced: Wooster

So not just UK... <bg>
Author
2 Mar 2007 1:50 AM
Robert Morley
Okay, now just to clarify:  Worcester is pronounce Wooster, but what about
Worcestershire?  Is it still Wooster...meaning you wonderful UK people are
not only dropping the "rce", but also the entire last syllable "shire"?


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"PeterD" <pet***@hipson.net> wrote in message
news:tkreu2du1l75t27k672m7kidfu7km1u8m6@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:22:37 -0500, "Robert Morley"
> <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
>>So "Wooster" like you'd say, "don't be a wuss"? :)
>>
>>Well, it may be that in the UK, but then again, you guys are known for
>>removing letters or entire syllables from the names of your towns, like
>>Norwich (pr. Norrich), Birmingham (Birminham), Gloucestershire
>>(Glostershire), Worcestershire (see previous discussion), and no doubt
>>many
>>others that us poor North Americans are unaware of. <grin>
>>
>>
>
> Worcester MA. Big city...
>
> pronounced: Wooster
>
> So not just UK... <bg>
Author
2 Mar 2007 7:39 AM
J French
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:50:19 -0500, "Robert Morley"
<rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:

>Okay, now just to clarify:  Worcester is pronounce Wooster, but what about
>Worcestershire?  Is it still Wooster...meaning you wonderful UK people are
>not only dropping the "rce", but also the entire last syllable "shire"?

It is Woostershire

- although some people who live there might pronounce it as
   Warstershoirre

They are of course wrong <g>

Mind you, Americans have some funny pronounciations, my favourite is
'route'  pronounced as 'rowt' rather than 'root'

In British English a 'rout' is a total defeat and a 'router' is for
gouging holes in things, not a message switching device.

Reminds me, we've not been giving lessons in Brit slang recently ...
Author
2 Mar 2007 1:13 PM
Ralph
Show quote Hide quote
"J French" <erew***@nowhere.uk> wrote in message
news:45e7d2f5.2684643@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:50:19 -0500, "Robert Morley"
> <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
> >Okay, now just to clarify:  Worcester is pronounce Wooster, but what
about
> >Worcestershire?  Is it still Wooster...meaning you wonderful UK people
are
> >not only dropping the "rce", but also the entire last syllable "shire"?
>
> It is Woostershire
>
> - although some people who live there might pronounce it as
>    Warstershoirre
>
> They are of course wrong <g>
>
> Mind you, Americans have some funny pronounciations, my favourite is
> 'route'  pronounced as 'rowt' rather than 'root'
>
> In British English a 'rout' is a total defeat and a 'router' is for
> gouging holes in things, not a message switching device.
>
> Reminds me, we've not been giving lessons in Brit slang recently ...

In America (where the only correct English is still spoken) you always have
to consider context. For example, you will often hear people mix
pronunciations, as in " To get to 'root' 66, take country 'rout' 40", or "I
need to put the 'warsh' in the 'wahshing' machine".

To insist that different things must be pronounced the same just because
they unfortunately share the same arrangement of constants and vowels,
smacks of franco-induced elitism. And thankfully is little tolerated by most
Americans.

-ralph
<g>
Author
2 Mar 2007 4:49 PM
Robert Morley
Now THAT's interesting.  Here in Canada, everybody I know of pronounces the
message switching device as a "rowter", but "route" is "root"...and just to
add to the confusion, some people pronounce the noun as "root", but the verb
(i.e., to route something through somewhere) as "rowt".

And on the topic of "roots", I remember being at Disneyworld in Florida a
couple of years ago, and my friend and I were at the Canadian Pavilion,
talking with the sales girl, who was from Canada as well (they try to
"import" natives for each pavilion).  Anyway, an American walks in and wants
to know where the "Reuts" (aka "Roots") t-shirts are, which is a famous
Canadian brand of clothing for those that don't know.  I don't know if
you've ever heard this particular accent--even here in Canada, which is a
lot closer, I've only heard it a handful of times--but some Americans
pronounce long "oo" sounds (like "root" or "roof") more like the "oo" in
"foot" or "soot" (or the French "eu" sound, which is why I spelled it that
way).  So anyway, this guy comes in and asks for a "Reuts" t-shirt.  The
three of us all shared a look and tried REALLY hard to hide the smiles on
our faces.  I dunno if that translates well, but I guess it's kinda like the
Brits feel when we talk about seeing a "soccer" game...it's just WRONG to
hear it that way, yet somehow amusing at the same time. :D

And finally, it's funny that you bring up British slang because just last
night I found myself on a website that happens to include a British-American
dictionary, including the various insult words, Cockney rhyming slang, and
all kinds of other things.  Very interesting for either the linguist, the
hobbyist linguist like me, or the just plain curious.  Here it is, for any
who are interested:  http://www.bbcamerica.com/content/141/dictionary.jsp.



Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"J French" <erew***@nowhere.uk> wrote in message
news:45e7d2f5.2684643@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:50:19 -0500, "Robert Morley"
> <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
>>Okay, now just to clarify:  Worcester is pronounce Wooster, but what about
>>Worcestershire?  Is it still Wooster...meaning you wonderful UK people are
>>not only dropping the "rce", but also the entire last syllable "shire"?
>
> It is Woostershire
>
> - although some people who live there might pronounce it as
>   Warstershoirre
>
> They are of course wrong <g>
>
> Mind you, Americans have some funny pronounciations, my favourite is
> 'route'  pronounced as 'rowt' rather than 'root'
>
> In British English a 'rout' is a total defeat and a 'router' is for
> gouging holes in things, not a message switching device.
>
> Reminds me, we've not been giving lessons in Brit slang recently ...
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:29 PM
J French
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:36:28 -0500, "Robert Morley"
<rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:

>And of course, the problem with PI Number is that everybody would think you
>meant 3.14 (~ish <g>).  So in that context, PIN Number does sorta make
>sense, even if it's a little redundant.  But then again, humanity is rife
>with redundancies.  Take, for example, international currency.  One common
>format is:  CAD$100.00 or USD$100.00.  Now, why on earth do you need the
>"D", which stands for dollars, when you've got the dollar-sign right next to
>it? 

Actually it is the $ that is redundant

I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:35 PM
Robert Morley
I've seen it with and without the $.  I think the idea was to make it clear
that it was a monetary amount by including the symbol, but not being any
form of financier, I won't claim that I know that for certain.


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"J French" <erew***@nowhere.uk> wrote in message
news:45e71afb.39958394@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:36:28 -0500, "Robert Morley"
> <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
>>And of course, the problem with PI Number is that everybody would think
>>you
>>meant 3.14 (~ish <g>).  So in that context, PIN Number does sorta make
>>sense, even if it's a little redundant.  But then again, humanity is rife
>>with redundancies.  Take, for example, international currency.  One common
>>format is:  CAD$100.00 or USD$100.00.  Now, why on earth do you need the
>>"D", which stands for dollars, when you've got the dollar-sign right next
>>to
>>it?
>
> Actually it is the $ that is redundant
>
> I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
> codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$
>
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:49 PM
J French
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:35:25 -0500, "Robert Morley"
<rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:

>I've seen it with and without the $.  I think the idea was to make it clear
>that it was a monetary amount by including the symbol, but not being any
>form of financier, I won't claim that I know that for certain.

Funny that, I'm familiar with $US and US$  but normally when you see
USD or CAD you know that you are reading stuff written by someone with
international banking experience.
Author
2 Mar 2007 4:54 PM
Robert Morley
Well, I just saw CDN$ on a website last night, though that's not quite the
same, since there's no redundancy there.  It could well be that people are
mixing their symbols and ending up with redundancies as a result.  I worked
as a temp for several years, and in that time, I saw SOOO many different
standards for things like phone numbers, international currency, dates,
etc., it's not even funny.


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"J French" <erew***@nowhere.uk> wrote in message
news:45e71f7b.41110614@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:35:25 -0500, "Robert Morley"
> <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
>>I've seen it with and without the $.  I think the idea was to make it
>>clear
>>that it was a monetary amount by including the symbol, but not being any
>>form of financier, I won't claim that I know that for certain.
>
> Funny that, I'm familiar with $US and US$  but normally when you see
> USD or CAD you know that you are reading stuff written by someone with
> international banking experience.
Author
2 Mar 2007 9:05 AM
Jan Hyde
erew***@nowhere.uk (J French)'s wild thoughts were released
on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:29:57 GMT bearing the following
fruit:

Show quoteHide quote
>On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:36:28 -0500, "Robert Morley"
><rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote:
>
>>And of course, the problem with PI Number is that everybody would think you
>>meant 3.14 (~ish <g>).  So in that context, PIN Number does sorta make
>>sense, even if it's a little redundant.  But then again, humanity is rife
>>with redundancies.  Take, for example, international currency.  One common
>>format is:  CAD$100.00 or USD$100.00.  Now, why on earth do you need the
>>"D", which stands for dollars, when you've got the dollar-sign right next to
>>it? 
>
>Actually it is the $ that is redundant
>
>I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
>codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$

Agreed - I've never seen both used.
Author
2 Mar 2007 9:32 AM
J French
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:05:20 +0000, Jan Hyde
<StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
<snip>

>>I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
>>codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$

>Agreed - I've never seen both used.

Have you also done banking stuff Jan ?
Author
2 Mar 2007 1:06 PM
Jan Hyde
erew***@nowhere.uk (J French)'s wild thoughts were released
on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:32:36 GMT bearing the following
fruit:

>On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:05:20 +0000, Jan Hyde
><StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
><snip>
>
>>>I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
>>>codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$
>
>>Agreed - I've never seen both used.
>
>Have you also done banking stuff Jan ?

From a software pouint of view? Not really, part of our
software suite is an accounts package (there can be a lot of
bank accounts to mangage too) but it's not really my area, I
don't think I'll ever get my head round accounts fully.
Author
2 Mar 2007 1:33 PM
Ralph
Show quote Hide quote
"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
news:3t7gu29chmciciohu727upl4vuqa1n40pt@4ax.com...
> erew***@nowhere.uk (J French)'s wild thoughts were released
> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:32:36 GMT bearing the following
> fruit:
>
> >On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:05:20 +0000, Jan Hyde
> ><StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
> ><snip>
> >
> >>>I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
> >>>codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$
> >
> >>Agreed - I've never seen both used.
> >
> >Have you also done banking stuff Jan ?
>
> From a software pouint of view? Not really, part of our
> software suite is an accounts package (there can be a lot of
> bank accounts to mangage too) but it's not really my area, I
> don't think I'll ever get my head round accounts fully.
>

Accounting software/programming is no problem once you appreciate that it is
nothing more than a bunch of high-sounding re-naming and re-ordering of
things you learned in the 5th Grade.

One only needs to sit quietly and appear to take notes. It's only when one
starts thinking there is something 'new' here and try to follow along, that
one gets into trouble.

-ralph
<g>
Author
3 Mar 2007 8:25 AM
J French
Show quote Hide quote
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:33:56 -0600, "Ralph" <nt_consultin***@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>
>"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
>news:3t7gu29chmciciohu727upl4vuqa1n40pt@4ax.com...
>> erew***@nowhere.uk (J French)'s wild thoughts were released
>> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:32:36 GMT bearing the following
>> fruit:
>>
>> >On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:05:20 +0000, Jan Hyde
>> ><StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
>> ><snip>
>> >
>> >>>I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
>> >>>codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$
>> >
>> >>Agreed - I've never seen both used.
>> >
>> >Have you also done banking stuff Jan ?
>>
>> From a software pouint of view? Not really, part of our
>> software suite is an accounts package (there can be a lot of
>> bank accounts to mangage too) but it's not really my area, I
>> don't think I'll ever get my head round accounts fully.
>>

>Accounting software/programming is no problem once you appreciate that it is
>nothing more than a bunch of high-sounding re-naming and re-ordering of
>things you learned in the 5th Grade.

>One only needs to sit quietly and appear to take notes. It's only when one
>starts thinking there is something 'new' here and try to follow along, that
>one gets into trouble.

Generally I've taken briefs from people, gone away and returned with
something simple and intuitive.

I suspect a lot of software is specified by accountants who are doing
things by rote, and written by programmers who don't have a clue what
they are doing.

Taking a carving knife to it, and getting back down to the bare bones
is quite interesting - although it can lead to punch ups with clients
<g>

Normally after the first battle, they learn ...
Author
3 Mar 2007 4:41 PM
Aalaan
and he hasn't even mentioned that the debits are near the window...

Show quoteHide quote
"J French" <erew***@nowhere.uk> wrote in message
news:45e92f89.2100722@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:33:56 -0600, "Ralph" <nt_consultin***@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jan Hyde" <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote in message
>>news:3t7gu29chmciciohu727upl4vuqa1n40pt@4ax.com...
>>> erew***@nowhere.uk (J French)'s wild thoughts were released
>>> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:32:36 GMT bearing the following
>>> fruit:
>>>
>>> >On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:05:20 +0000, Jan Hyde
>>> ><StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
>>> ><snip>
>>> >
>>> >>>I've done a lot of banking software and recognize CAD and USD as ISO
>>> >>>codes, but until today I've never seen CAD$ or USD$
>>> >
>>> >>Agreed - I've never seen both used.
>>> >
>>> >Have you also done banking stuff Jan ?
>>>
>>> From a software pouint of view? Not really, part of our
>>> software suite is an accounts package (there can be a lot of
>>> bank accounts to mangage too) but it's not really my area, I
>>> don't think I'll ever get my head round accounts fully.
>>>
>
>>Accounting software/programming is no problem once you appreciate that it
>>is
>>nothing more than a bunch of high-sounding re-naming and re-ordering of
>>things you learned in the 5th Grade.
>
>>One only needs to sit quietly and appear to take notes. It's only when one
>>starts thinking there is something 'new' here and try to follow along,
>>that
>>one gets into trouble.
>
> Generally I've taken briefs from people, gone away and returned with
> something simple and intuitive.
>
> I suspect a lot of software is specified by accountants who are doing
> things by rote, and written by programmers who don't have a clue what
> they are doing.
>
> Taking a carving knife to it, and getting back down to the bare bones
> is quite interesting - although it can lead to punch ups with clients
> <g>
>
> Normally after the first battle, they learn ...
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:42 PM
Jan Hyde
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam>'s wild thoughts were
released on Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:00:08 -0500 bearing the
following fruit:

Show quoteHide quote
><skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1172764091.038283.326840@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
>> I have two words that I want to assing a data type (string) the two
>> words such as Pin Numbers, however, VB data type won't recognize
>> unless the two words are joined as one word.
>>
>> And joining the two words is impossible since I am working with a pre
>> existing database.
>>
>> Do you know how to work around this problem?
>
>I have no idea what you're asking. Post some sample code that you tried
>which didn't work and maybe we can glean something from it.
>
>And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number. "PIN
>Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just stupid.

If you hadn't have done it I've been compeled to ;-)
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:24 PM
Karl E. Peterson
Jan Hyde <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
> "Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam>'s wild thoughts were
>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number. "PIN
>> Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just stupid.
>
> If you hadn't have done it I've been compeled to ;-)

Alright then, how's this usage read: "Today, the NASA launched..."
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:32 PM
Robert Morley
That sounds dumb.  It's perfectly grammatically correct, of course,
but...eww!


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"Karl E. Peterson" <k***@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:OLPYo7CXHHA.4860@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Jan Hyde <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
>> "Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam>'s wild thoughts were
>>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number.
>>> "PIN
>>> Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just stupid.
>>
>> If you hadn't have done it I've been compeled to ;-)
>
> Alright then, how's this usage read: "Today, the NASA launched..."
> --
> .NET: It's About Trust!
> http://vfred.mvps.org
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:43 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Karl E. Peterson" <k***@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:OLPYo7CXHHA.4860@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Alright

AAAAGGGGHHHHH!!!!
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:56 PM
Karl E. Peterson
Karl E. Peterson <k***@mvps.org> wrote:
> Jan Hyde <StellaDrin***@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
>> "Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam>'s wild thoughts were
>>> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number. "PIN
>>> Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just stupid.
>>
>> If you hadn't have done it I've been compeled to ;-)
>
> Alright then, how's this usage read: "Today, the NASA launched..."

Beats "the google", eh? <gd&r>
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org
Author
1 Mar 2007 7:08 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Karl E. Peterson" <k***@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:OUEnhNDXHHA.1000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Beats "the google", eh? <gd&r>

I just heard someone say that yesterday and almost screamed.
Author
1 Mar 2007 7:13 PM
Karl E. Peterson
Jeff Johnson <i.get@enough.spam> wrote:
> "Karl E. Peterson" <k***@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:OUEnhNDXHHA.1000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
>> Beats "the google", eh? <gd&r>
>
> I just heard someone say that yesterday and almost screamed.

Ever googled "the google"? <g>
--
..NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org
Author
2 Mar 2007 9:45 PM
Jim Carlock
"Karl E. Peterson" wrote...
: Ever googled "the google"? <g>

Goggle at google, and google yahoo.

--
Jim Carlock
Post replies to the group.
Author
2 Mar 2007 10:11 AM
Henning
Show quote Hide quote
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> skrev i meddelandet
news:uaqeuqBXHHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> <skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1172764091.038283.326840@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I have two words that I want to assing a data type (string) the two
> > words such as Pin Numbers, however, VB data type won't recognize
> > unless the two words are joined as one word.
> >
> > And joining the two words is impossible since I am working with a pre
> > existing database.
> >
> > Do you know how to work around this problem?
>
> I have no idea what you're asking. Post some sample code that you tried
> which didn't work and maybe we can glean something from it.
>
> And I can't hold back: PIN stands for Personal Identifcation Number. "PIN
> Number" is "Personal Identification Number Number" and it's just stupid.
>
>
What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from say 1 to
64? Is that stupid?

/Henning
Author
2 Mar 2007 7:59 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:45e7f942$0$17843$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...

> What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from say 1
> to
> 64? Is that stupid?

No, but you're silly.
Author
2 Mar 2007 8:51 PM
Henning
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> skrev i meddelandet
news:uMGT8UQXHHA.4668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45e7f942$0$17843$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...
>
> > What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from say 1
> > to
> > 64? Is that stupid?
>
> No, but you're silly.
>
>
Ahaa! The fact that you know of no other Pin Numbers than PIN, makes me
stupid?

/Henning
Author
2 Mar 2007 8:58 PM
Henning
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> skrev i meddelandet
news:uMGT8UQXHHA.4668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45e7f942$0$17843$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...
>
> > What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from say 1
> > to
> > 64? Is that stupid?
>
> No, but you're silly.
>
>
Ahaaa! The fact that you know of no other Pin Numbers than PIN, makes me
silly?

/Henning
Author
2 Mar 2007 9:48 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:45e890fa$0$17842$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...

>> > What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from say
>> > 1
>> > to
>> > 64? Is that stupid?
>>
>> No, but you're silly.
>>
>>
> Ahaaa! The fact that you know of no other Pin Numbers than PIN, makes me
> silly?

No, the fact that you're deliberately being silly makes you silly*. And a
"Pin Number" is NOT the same as a "PIN Number." As much as I hate
case-sensitivity in a programming language, it definitely applies in written
language!


*In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
shot....)
Author
2 Mar 2007 10:56 PM
Henning
Show quote Hide quote
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> skrev i meddelandet
news:OmEWASRXHHA.2052@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45e890fa$0$17842$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...
>
> >> > What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from
say
> >> > 1
> >> > to
> >> > 64? Is that stupid?
> >>
> >> No, but you're silly.
> >>
> >>
> > Ahaaa! The fact that you know of no other Pin Numbers than PIN, makes me
> > silly?
>
> No, the fact that you're deliberately being silly makes you silly*. And a
> "Pin Number" is NOT the same as a "PIN Number." As much as I hate
> case-sensitivity in a programming language, it definitely applies in
written
> language!
>
And the OP did write "Pin Numbers", you put in the "PIN Number".
>
> *In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
> shot....)
>
>
And your writing is not offending?
This will lead to nothing, so I'm out of the arguing. Even if I still can't
get what is upsetting _you_.

/Henning
Author
5 Mar 2007 9:41 PM
Jeff Johnson
Show quote Hide quote
"Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:45e8ac85$0$17843$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...

>> >> > What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from
> say
>> >> > 1
>> >> > to
>> >> > 64? Is that stupid?
>> >>
>> >> No, but you're silly.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Ahaaa! The fact that you know of no other Pin Numbers than PIN, makes
>> > me
>> > silly?
>>
>> No, the fact that you're deliberately being silly makes you silly*. And a
>> "Pin Number" is NOT the same as a "PIN Number." As much as I hate
>> case-sensitivity in a programming language, it definitely applies in
> written
>> language!
>>
> And the OP did write "Pin Numbers", you put in the "PIN Number".
>>
>> *In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
>> shot....)
>>
>>
> And your writing is not offending?
> This will lead to nothing, so I'm out of the arguing. Even if I still
> can't
> get what is upsetting _you_.

Ohhhhh, I see. You've actually been completely serious this whole time? Wow.

Okay, here's the deal: Yes, you are correct, the original poster wrote "Pin
Number." I made the assumption (or as I like to think of it, "played the
odds") and figured the poster was talking about Personal Identification
Numbers--as such a thing is far more common in databases than the pin
numbers you're talking about--and went on my rant. Many people can't be
bothered to hold down the Shift key long enough to capitalize an acronym or
they simply don't know that PIN actually IS an acronym (which is likely,
because then they'd probably understand the redundancy of "PIN number").

I thought you were being tounge-in-cheek with your literal interpretation of
the question. I guess you weren't.
Author
5 Mar 2007 10:55 PM
Henning
Show quote Hide quote
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> skrev i meddelandet
news:e5mnB82XHHA.992@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> "Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45e8ac85$0$17843$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...
>
> >> >> > What if it is kind of a hardware IC database with Pin Numbers from
> > say
> >> >> > 1
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > 64? Is that stupid?
> >> >>
> >> >> No, but you're silly.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Ahaaa! The fact that you know of no other Pin Numbers than PIN, makes
> >> > me
> >> > silly?
> >>
> >> No, the fact that you're deliberately being silly makes you silly*. And
a
> >> "Pin Number" is NOT the same as a "PIN Number." As much as I hate
> >> case-sensitivity in a programming language, it definitely applies in
> > written
> >> language!
> >>
> > And the OP did write "Pin Numbers", you put in the "PIN Number".
> >>
> >> *In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
> >> shot....)
> >>
> >>
> > And your writing is not offending?
> > This will lead to nothing, so I'm out of the arguing. Even if I still
> > can't
> > get what is upsetting _you_.
>
> Ohhhhh, I see. You've actually been completely serious this whole time?
Wow.
>
> Okay, here's the deal: Yes, you are correct, the original poster wrote
"Pin
> Number." I made the assumption (or as I like to think of it, "played the
> odds") and figured the poster was talking about Personal Identification
> Numbers--as such a thing is far more common in databases than the pin
> numbers you're talking about--and went on my rant. Many people can't be
> bothered to hold down the Shift key long enough to capitalize an acronym
or
> they simply don't know that PIN actually IS an acronym (which is likely,
> because then they'd probably understand the redundancy of "PIN number").
>
> I thought you were being tounge-in-cheek with your literal interpretation
of
> the question. I guess you weren't.
>
>
Ok, taken! Yes I was, and thats why I couldn't understand.
You knew I couldn't leave did you. I agree that PIN Number is equal to IC
circuit.

Friends?

/Henning
Author
6 Mar 2007 2:52 AM
Jeff Johnson
"Henning" <computer_h***@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:45eca13e$0$17842$57c3e1d3@news3.bahnhof.se...

> Ok, taken! Yes I was, and thats why I couldn't understand.
> You knew I couldn't leave did you. I agree that PIN Number is equal to IC
> circuit.

There you go!! Or NIC card....

> Friends?

Absolutely, once "IC circuit" sank in. (The line break threw me for a
moment!)
Author
6 Mar 2007 3:42 AM
Jim Carlock
"Henning" stated...
: Ok, taken! Yes I was, and thats why I couldn't understand.
: You knew I couldn't leave did you. I agree that PIN Number
: is equal to IC circuit.

"Jeff Johnson" posted...
: There you go!! Or NIC card....

NIC card? You lost me there. I thought serial port and parallel
port.

Isn't "NIC card" like Network Interface Card card? ;-)

--
Jim Carlock
Post replies to the group.
Author
6 Mar 2007 8:02 AM
J French
Show quote Hide quote
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:42:54 -0500, "Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost>
wrote:

>"Henning" stated...
>: Ok, taken! Yes I was, and thats why I couldn't understand.
>: You knew I couldn't leave did you. I agree that PIN Number
>: is equal to IC circuit.
>
>"Jeff Johnson" posted...
>: There you go!! Or NIC card....
>
>NIC card? You lost me there. I thought serial port and parallel
>port.

>Isn't "NIC card" like Network Interface Card card? ;-)

Or LCD Display  :-}
Author
7 Mar 2007 10:41 AM
Jim Carlock
"J French" wrote
: Or LCD Display  :-}

Or Microsoft defined "multiple protocol adapters"???
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/mswnsk98/html/vbmthBindMethod.asp

--
Jim Carlock
Post replies to the group.
Author
6 Mar 2007 2:11 PM
Jeff Johnson
Show quote Hide quote
"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@localhost> wrote in message
news:eRXKJG6XHHA.992@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Henning" stated...
> : Ok, taken! Yes I was, and thats why I couldn't understand.
> : You knew I couldn't leave did you. I agree that PIN Number
> : is equal to IC circuit.
>
> "Jeff Johnson" posted...
> : There you go!! Or NIC card....
>
> NIC card? You lost me there. I thought serial port and parallel
> port.
>
> Isn't "NIC card" like Network Interface Card card? ;-)

Uh, yeah. Did you miss the earlier stuff about Personal Identification
Number number and Integrated Circuit circuit?
Author
6 Mar 2007 9:28 PM
Jim Carlock
> "Henning" stated...
> : Ok, taken! Yes I was, and thats why I couldn't understand.
> : You knew I couldn't leave did you. I agree that PIN Number
> : is equal to IC circuit.
>
> "Jeff Johnson" posted...
> : There you go!! Or NIC card....

"Jim Carlock" replied...
> NIC card? You lost me there. I thought serial port and parallel
> port.
>
> Isn't "NIC card" like Network Interface Card card? ;-)


"Jeff Johnson" posted...
: Uh, yeah. Did you miss the earlier stuff about Personal
: Identification Number number and Integrated Circuit circuit?

Yeah, realized I read all that after posting. The left side reached
over into the right side and created an unendless loop as the right
side artistically bungled the logic the left side tried to comprehend.

--
Jim Carlock
Post replies to the group.
Author
3 Mar 2007 9:44 AM
Bob O`Bob
Jeff Johnson wrote:

> *In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
> shot....)
>


Come the revolution, we shall line them up against the wall, in Pun Number order.
Author
3 Mar 2007 10:59 AM
Ralph
"Bob O`Bob" <filter***@yahoogroups.com> wrote in message
news:eKr1XiXXHHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> > *In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
> > shot....)
> >
>
>
> Come the revolution, we shall line them up against the wall, in Pun Number
order.

Assuming we can first determine which one has the dimple or dot so we would
know where to start counting.

-ralph
Author
3 Mar 2007 10:18 PM
Bob O`Bob
Ralph wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> "Bob O`Bob" <filter***@yahoogroups.com> wrote in message
> news:eKr1XiXXHHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> *In fact, some may consider this a pun. (In which case you should be
>>> shot....)
>>>
>>
>> Come the revolution, we shall line them up against the wall, in Pun Number
> order.
>
> Assuming we can first determine which one has the dimple or dot so we would
> know where to start counting.
>


"face down, nine-edge first"
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:00 PM
Bob Butler
<skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172764091.038283.326840@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
> I have two words that I want to assing a data type (string) the two
> words such as Pin Numbers, however, VB data type won't recognize
> unless the two words are joined as one word.
>
> And joining the two words is impossible since I am working with a pre
> existing database.
>
> Do you know how to work around this problem?

I think you need to post a sample of what you are trying to do.  Column
names in a database can include spaces (it's a bad idea IMO but it happens)
while VB variables can not but the two are not the same so it doesn't matter

dim sPIN As String
set rs=db.execute("Select [PIN Number] from thetable where whatever")
sPIN= "" & rs.Fields("PIN Number").Value
Msgbox sPIN, vbOKOnly,"PIN Number"
sPIN="42"
db.execute "Update thetable Set [PIN Number]='" & sPIN & "' where whatever"

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:25 PM
skennedyd
Show quote Hide quote
On Mar 1, 11:00 am, "Bob Butler" <tiredo...@nospam.ever> wrote:
> <skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172764091.038283.326840@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
>
> > I have two words that I want to assing a data type (string) the two
> > words such as Pin Numbers, however, VB data type won't recognize
> > unless the two words are joined as one word.
>
> > And joining the two words is impossible since I am working with a pre
> > existing database.
>
> > Do you know how to work around this problem?
>
> I think you need to post a sample of what you are trying to do.  Column
> names in a database can include spaces (it's a bad idea IMO but it happens)
> while VB variables can not but the two are not the same so it doesn't matter
>
> dim sPIN As String
> set rs=db.execute("Select [PIN Number] from thetable where whatever")
> sPIN= "" & rs.Fields("PIN Number").Value
> Msgbox sPIN, vbOKOnly,"PIN Number"
> sPIN="42"
> db.execute "Update thetable Set [PIN Number]='" & sPIN & "' where whatever"
>
> --
> Reply to the group so all can participate
> VB.Net: "Fool me once..."

Thank you Jeff and Bob for the help.

Here's what I was trying to accomplish:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Sub cmdSearch_Click()
    Dim Pin NumberRef As String
    Dim strSearch As String

'Check txtSearch for Null value or Nill Entry first.

    If IsNull(Me![txtSearch]) Or (Me![txtSearch]) = "" Then
        MsgBox "Please enter a value!", vbOKOnly, "Invalid Search
Criterion!"
        Me![txtSearch].SetFocus
    Exit Sub
End If

    DoCmd.ShowAllRecords
    DoCmd.GoToControl ("Pin Number")
    DoCmd.FindRecord Me!txtSearch

    Pin Number.SetFocus
    Pin NumberRef = Pin Number
    txtSearch.SetFocus
    strSearch = txtSearch

        End If
End Sub
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:39 PM
Bob Butler
<skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172766329.627699.130930@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
> Thank you Jeff and Bob for the help.
>
> Here's what I was trying to accomplish:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Private Sub cmdSearch_Click()
>     Dim Pin NumberRef As String
>     Dim strSearch As String
>
> 'Check txtSearch for Null value or Nill Entry first.

VB can't have a NULL in a textbox; not sure about VBA in Access which is
what your code appears to be.  For future reference you should ask in an
Access VBA newsgroup since while VB and VBA overlap they are not the same
thing.

>     If IsNull(Me![txtSearch]) Or (Me![txtSearch]) = "" Then

Again, not sure about Access VBA but in VB the "preferred" test would be
If Len(txtSearch.Text)=0 Then

>         MsgBox "Please enter a value!", vbOKOnly, "Invalid Search
> Criterion!"

While I'm at it, yelling at your users is bad form.
http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/

>         Me![txtSearch].SetFocus
>     Exit Sub
> End If
>
>     DoCmd.ShowAllRecords
>     DoCmd.GoToControl ("Pin Number")
>     DoCmd.FindRecord Me!txtSearch
>
>     Pin Number.SetFocus
>     Pin NumberRef = Pin Number

If you have a control named "Pin Number" then that's a huge difference from
VB -- that would not be allowed.  My guess would be that you'd have to stick
with the ugly Me! syntax
Me![Pin Number].SetFocus

and lose the space in "Pin NumberRef"

but re-posting in an Access VBA newsgroup would be the best option since
people responding there would be more familiar with it.

>     txtSearch.SetFocus
>     strSearch = txtSearch
>
>         End If
> End Sub

--
Reply to the group so all can participate
VB.Net: "Fool me once..."
Author
1 Mar 2007 4:49 PM
skennedyd
Show quote Hide quote
On Mar 1, 11:39 am, "Bob Butler" <tiredo...@nospam.ever> wrote:
> <skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172766329.627699.130930@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
>
> > Thank you Jeff and Bob for the help.
>
> > Here's what I was trying to accomplish:
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Private Sub cmdSearch_Click()
> >     Dim Pin NumberRef As String
> >     Dim strSearch As String
>
> > 'Check txtSearch for Null value or Nill Entry first.
>
> VB can't have a NULL in a textbox; not sure about VBA in Access which is
> what your code appears to be.  For future reference you should ask in an
> Access VBA newsgroup since while VB and VBA overlap they are not the same
> thing.
>
> >     If IsNull(Me![txtSearch]) Or (Me![txtSearch]) = "" Then
>
> Again, not sure about Access VBA but in VB the "preferred" test would be
> If Len(txtSearch.Text)=0 Then
>
> >         MsgBox "Please enter a value!", vbOKOnly, "Invalid Search
> > Criterion!"
>
> While I'm at it, yelling at your users is bad form.http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/
>
> >         Me![txtSearch].SetFocus
> >     Exit Sub
> > End If
>
> >     DoCmd.ShowAllRecords
> >     DoCmd.GoToControl ("Pin Number")
> >     DoCmd.FindRecord Me!txtSearch
>
> >     Pin Number.SetFocus
> >     Pin NumberRef = Pin Number
>
> If you have a control named "Pin Number" then that's a huge difference from
> VB -- that would not be allowed.  My guess would be that you'd have to stick
> with the ugly Me! syntax
> Me![Pin Number].SetFocus
>
> and lose the space in "Pin NumberRef"
>
> but re-posting in an Access VBA newsgroup would be the best option since
> people responding there would be more familiar with it.
>
> >     txtSearch.SetFocus
> >     strSearch = txtSearch
>
> >         End If
> > End Sub
>
> --
> Reply to the group so all can participate
> VB.Net: "Fool me once..."

--------------------------------------------

Thank you Bob, I will post in Access VB group.
Author
1 Mar 2007 5:16 PM
Jeff Johnson
<skenne***@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172767783.849774.158960@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

> Thank you Bob, I will post in Access VB group.

I recommend microsoft.public.access.formscoding.
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:00 PM
Robert Morley
> Again, not sure about Access VBA but in VB the "preferred" test would be
> If Len(txtSearch.Text)=0 Then

In Access, a control's .Text property can't be accessed unless the control
has the focus (which is very annoying).  The .Value property doesn't suffer
that affliction.  The way I commonly use to deal with Nulls and empty
strings is:  If Nz(Me!txtSearch.Value)="" Then...  Nz is an Access function
which converts a Null to an Empty (i.e., "" or 0, depending on data type).

> My guess would be that you'd have to stick
> with the ugly Me! syntax
> Me![Pin Number].SetFocus

To my knowledge, Me! is the preferred format in Access...at least
personally, I would never even consider using implicit control names without
prefacing them with Me! (not to be confused with prefacing them with me
<g>).  And yes, you're right, the square brackets are necessary for names
with spaces in them.



Rob
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:18 PM
Robert Morley
Woops, I should've said that Nz is a function which returns Empty if a Null
is passed, but will otherwise return the value passed unchanged.  That makes
a bit more sense, doesn't it? <blush>


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
news:%23fqIdxCXHHA.4252@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Again, not sure about Access VBA but in VB the "preferred" test would be
>> If Len(txtSearch.Text)=0 Then
>
> In Access, a control's .Text property can't be accessed unless the control
> has the focus (which is very annoying).  The .Value property doesn't
> suffer that affliction.  The way I commonly use to deal with Nulls and
> empty strings is:  If Nz(Me!txtSearch.Value)="" Then...  Nz is an Access
> function which converts a Null to an Empty (i.e., "" or 0, depending on
> data type).
>
>> My guess would be that you'd have to stick
>> with the ugly Me! syntax
>> Me![Pin Number].SetFocus
>
> To my knowledge, Me! is the preferred format in Access...at least
> personally, I would never even consider using implicit control names
> without prefacing them with Me! (not to be confused with prefacing them
> with me <g>).  And yes, you're right, the square brackets are necessary
> for names with spaces in them.
>
>
>
> Rob
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:41 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
news:%23n$s$3CXHHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Woops, I should've said that Nz is a function which returns Empty if a
> Null is passed, but will otherwise return the value passed unchanged.
> That makes a bit more sense, doesn't it? <blush>

Not in VB it doesn't. Nz() returns an empty STRING. "Empty" means something
else....
Author
1 Mar 2007 6:57 PM
Robert Morley
In VB6, the Nz() function doesn't exist at all.  In Access, it returns the
original value if a value was passed, or Empty (which then gets converted to
either "" or 0, depending on the data type receiving it).  Debug.Print
TypeName(Nz(Null)) returns "Empty" in Access.

The VB6 equivalent would be some variation of:

Public Function Nz(ByVal Value As Variant, Optional ByVal ValueIfNull As
Variant) As Variant
    If IsNull(Value) Then
        If IsMissing(ValueIfNull) Then ValueIfNull = Empty
        Nz = ValueIfNull
    Else
        Nz = Value
    End If
End Function

Then, lngNumber = Nz(Null) returns 0, and strString = Nz(Null) returns "",
due to the implicit conversion of Empty to whatever is appropriate for the
underlying data type.


Rob

Show quoteHide quote
"Jeff Johnson" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
news:ueG%23wEDXHHA.3980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
> news:%23n$s$3CXHHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>> Woops, I should've said that Nz is a function which returns Empty if a
>> Null is passed, but will otherwise return the value passed unchanged.
>> That makes a bit more sense, doesn't it? <blush>
>
> Not in VB it doesn't. Nz() returns an empty STRING. "Empty" means
> something else....
>
Author
1 Mar 2007 7:14 PM
Jeff Johnson
"Robert Morley" <rmor***@magma.ca.N0.Freak1n.sparn> wrote in message
news:e7zl%23NDXHHA.4240@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Debug.Print TypeName(Nz(Null)) returns "Empty" in Access.

That's very interesting. I was going on what the documentation says, and it
never mentions Empty once. ? IsEmpty(Nz(Null)) returns True. And ? Empty =
"" returns True as well, in both Access and VB.

ETC at work....

Bookmark and Share