Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Mapping a new 'Network Place'

Author
12 May 2005 8:42 PM
lilary
I've got a logon script that I need to change for a small set of developers to standardize their machines.  The challenge is to create a folder (actually several folders) in the Nethood 'special folder' instead of a shortcut.  Creating a shortcut works using vbscript, but is not very clean when the users navigate to it since we have multiple trusted domains on our network.

I've attached a couple screen shots to hopefully clarify what my end result is...


Thanks.    +----------------------------------------------------------------+    |                Attachment filename: nethood.doc                |    |Download attachment: http://www.codecomments.com/attachment.php?postid=1611416 |    +----------------------------------------------------------------+ -- lilary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via http://www.codecomments.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Author
13 May 2005 8:18 PM
Jeff Johnson [MVP: VB]
"lilary" <lilary.1oz***@mail.codecomments.com> wrote in message
news:lilary.1ozn5q@mail.codecomments.com...

> I've got a logon script

microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript.

And don't attach screen shots in non-binary groups, regardless of size.
Provide a link to your graphic instead.
Author
13 May 2005 10:57 PM
MikeD
"Jeff Johnson [MVP: VB]" <i.get@enough.spam> wrote in message
news:OC5nnj$VFHA.1468@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
>
> And don't attach screen shots in non-binary groups, regardless of size.
> Provide a link to your graphic instead.


He did just provide a link, Jeff.  He just incorrectly described it as an
"attachment".

--
Mike
Microsoft MVP Visual Basic
Author
16 May 2005 2:59 PM
Jeff Johnson [MVP: VB]
"MikeD" <nob***@nowhere.edu> wrote in message
news:Ok95u8AWFHA.3572@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

>> And don't attach screen shots in non-binary groups, regardless of size.
>> Provide a link to your graphic instead.
>
>
> He did just provide a link, Jeff.  He just incorrectly described it as an
> "attachment".

I've got the feeling he MEANT for it to be an attachment but the interface
he was using changed it into a link instead (two points for the interface if
so). Now I could be wrong, but in case I'm not, hopefully he'll take the
advice to heart. If nothing else, I hope he learns the difference between
"link" and "attachment"!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button