|
code
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Firefox not performing client-side validationWhen I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class)
and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the
fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer internets. happinesses to helping shusta Show quoteHide quote On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > -- > Nathan Sokalski > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ whut?
Show quoteHide quote "shusta guthnar" wrote: > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > internets. > > happinesses to helping > > shusta > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > -- > > Nathan Sokalski > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > . > I wonder how I can jump on one of those alternative internets.
---------------------------------- http://www.sizemytires.com Show quoteHide quote "bigb" wrote: > whut? > > "shusta guthnar" wrote: > > > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > > internets. > > > > happinesses to helping > > > > shusta > > > > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > > -- > > > Nathan Sokalski > > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > > > . > > Poor fox, getting used like that.
Show quoteHide quote "Shaun" wrote: > I wonder how I can jump on one of those alternative internets. > > ---------------------------------- > http://www.sizemytires.com > > > "bigb" wrote: > > > whut? > > > > "shusta guthnar" wrote: > > > > > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > > > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > > > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > > > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > > > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > > > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > > > internets. > > > > > > happinesses to helping > > > > > > shusta > > > > > > > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > > > -- > > > > Nathan Sokalski > > > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > > > > > . > > > Are you serious? "Wishings" is so not a word.
Show quoteHide quote "shusta guthnar" wrote: > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > internets. > > happinesses to helping > > shusta > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > -- > > Nathan Sokalski > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > . > dear mister shustas. all your bases will belong to us.
Show quoteHide quote "shusta guthnar" wrote: > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > internets. > > happinesses to helping > > shusta > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > -- > > Nathan Sokalski > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > . > Have you really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more
like? Show quoteHide quote "shusta guthnar" wrote: > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > internets. > > happinesses to helping > > shusta > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > -- > > Nathan Sokalski > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > . > I'm chagrined and embarrassed by these replies. I have no idea whether
English is Mr. Shustas first language, but the ridicule heaped upon him is personally obnoxious and creates an atmosphere that stifles the kind of discussion that is the heart and soul of these forums. Assuming that Mr. Shustas was doing his best to convey his thoughts in a second language, and that the replies were intended to be as patronizing as they sounded, then I would like to apologize to Mr. Shustas; Americans are believed in much of the world to be arrogant and intolerant; my experience is generally the opposite, and I would like to believe these responses were either intended as humor or are an aberration. [Writing for myself alone and not expressing the opinions of any organization, employer or others] Very well said - thank you
-- Show quoteHide quotethanks - dave david_at_windward_dot_net http://www.windwardreports.com Cubicle Wars - http://www.windwardreports.com/film.htm "Jesse Liberty" wrote: > I'm chagrined and embarrassed by these replies. I have no idea whether > English is Mr. Shustas first language, but the ridicule heaped upon him is > personally obnoxious and creates an atmosphere that stifles the kind of > discussion that is the heart and soul of these forums. > > Assuming that Mr. Shustas was doing his best to convey his thoughts in a > second language, and that the replies were intended to be as patronizing as > they sounded, then I would like to apologize to Mr. Shustas; Americans are > believed in much of the world to be arrogant and intolerant; my experience is > generally the opposite, and I would like to believe these responses were > either intended as humor or are an aberration. > > [Writing for myself alone and not expressing the opinions of any > organization, employer or others] "Jesse Liberty" <Jesse Libe***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message Microsoft have now abandoned these newsgroups to their fate. They no longer news:8818B6E5-CEF5-44E7-97B2-A622BFD03104@microsoft.com... > I'm chagrined and embarrassed by these replies. monitor them, which means posts from cretins like the above get through... Sad, very sad... Dear Mr. Guthnar,
Please don't reproduce. As every technically enabled person is aware, IE breaks every standard and builds away from cross-platform browsing capabilities. It still contains the same rendering problems found in IE 6. Sincerely the technically enabled population of the planet earth. Show quoteHide quote "shusta guthnar" wrote: > dear mister nathans. your validatorness will rarely work with the > fox. the foxes is haveing much confusion when validation are needed > on pages because when many users are using the fox at one time it get > very confusing. go use your internet explorers only and you will have > many successes and happinesses in your hearts because this is doing > the most best needful. wishings you many happinesses in your computer > internets. > > happinesses to helping > > shusta > > > On Mar 24, 3:39 pm, "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > > -- > > Nathan Sokalski > > njsokal...@hotmail.comhttp://www.nathansokalski.com/ > > . > I think PHP will fix your problem.
Show quoteHide quote "Nathan Sokalski" wrote: > When I write a custom validator (by inheriting from the BaseValidator class) > and add a JavaScript function for client-side validation, Firefox does not > use it. All my validators work perfectly fine in Internet Explorer, and I'm > not using any browser-specific JavaScript or getting any JavaScript errors, > so what am I doing wrong? Thanks. > -- > Nathan Sokalski > njsokal***@hotmail.com > http://www.nathansokalski.com/ > |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics